Відео

I was more referring to the keyboard trackpad sets. Keyboards are fine.

Agreed!

The mac mini would definitely be a better option. Not only does it have intel's quick sync function for video work and playback, but it also has thunderbolt 3. This allows for eGPU's for a performance boost. It's also going to get at least one more year of official support. The Mac Pro is already unsupported and needs software modding to run the latest version of MacOS

Well, when it's a UA-camr who is abusing a system that keep this platform afloat in order to dox others, its kind of a big deal. So I just wanted to make my opinion clear.

I think that 40% also accounts for things like POS systems and public terminals at businesses.

@@GarrettCrespo that makes alot of sense. I was just wondering if the reason developers aren't making apps for android tablets is, that the market just isn't really there? Why use time and resources developing an app, only a handful of people will ever get to use? Just wondering if that could be a factor

It's either that or it's because android app's on phone can natively scale to tablet sizes (even though they shouldn't) and that results in dev's just letting the apps run all stretched out on tablet instead of making a bespoke interface that takes advantage of the bigger screens.

Agreed. I’d love to see this on other platforms. But getting hundreds of companies and all kinds of software to play nice together is what slows progress in that.

Fair use has been argued in court time and time again to the point where UA-cam has actually changed their policies and made them better for commentary, education, and reaction content. The problem here is someone claiming an entire video, striking a channel, and attempting to get a content creators personal information because they were mad. You can’t do that if a video actually follows fair use.

@@GarrettCrespo Thank you for your response. UA-cam will always change its rules just enough to comply with the law. That's what companies do. If it was up to UA-cam, this platform would be worse than 4Chan. But it's not a fringe website, it's a publicly traded company(Alphabet). I'm not a lawyer, and law differs from country to country, (while UA-cam is a global platform and has to comply with every country it operates in) but how is it fair use when someone profits from it? Because the videos we're talking about are monetized, aren't they? If it was just for education/reaction etc then those videos shouldn't get any money. For example, the Drumeo video you referenced (which I happened to watch), it's a high-quality production. I'm sure they spent lots of money, time, and effort to produce it. Why should you profit from their video? Isn't it the same with song remixes, stealing melodies/samples, etc? Everyone is free to make a remix of a song, but if they want to publish it and profit from it, they have to ask permission from the owner of the original song. Why should it be any different for content? As I said, I'm not a lawyer, it's what I think is the right way to make content.

The four factors of fair use have been established for a long time now and whether you agree with them or not, it's what UA-cam has put in place. It's part of their ToS, and it was abused by the creator I was talking about. Even if you don't agree with the ToS, it's still the law of the land here and this creator broke those laws. I also want to set one thing strait about my music channel and the videos on there. The Drumeo video you mentioned was claimed by Drumeo and the ad revenue went to them. That happens with any channel that is ok with fair use, but doesn't want people profiting from their content. It isn't a strike that debilitates a channel. It's just a claim that send's ad revenue to them. As for other creators that I've referenced in other videos, I have gotten ample support from the creators themselves for breaking down their content and promoting it to bring more attention to their work. In that instance, it's seen as a fair exchange. The profit I DO make (if I make any at all) is a fraction of what they made on the original content and is basically pay that these featured content creators don't have to pay for publicity. No reasonable creators here on UA-cam actually care if their content is used in a fair use situation, let alone strike a video to gain personal information for doxing. I've had my own content used in mashup/compilation videos that have gotten millions of views and made the creator tons of money. Do I care? No! Because it brings attention to my content. It's a fair exchange. Even though UA-cam/Alphabet is a company, the way that content is handled on the platform is completely different from the traditional media that you're referring to. UA-cam is a hybrid social media/news/review/TV/movie site that sources its content from independent contractors. When those contractors/creators go out of their way to violate ToS, falsely claim videos in order to Dox other creators and them gloat about it on video, that is a major issue that needs to be addressed.

Just to be clear, I haven't seen your music video(or the Anarchists' one), I just used the Drumeo video as an example cause I've seen the original. To continue with the same example, Drumeo could also ask UA-cam to take down your video. Maybe they didn't want their video to exist anywhere else but their own channel. Is it reasonable? No. But if it's within the ToS, they can. If you made a video talking trash about them and they wanted to sue you, then UA-cam is obliged to give your full name to them. Just like internet providers are required to give the owners of certain IP addresses when there's a legal case against them. Who are they supposed to sue, darkfairy69 or WhiteKnight2244555? And no, UA-cam, Facebook, Twitter, etc are no different than traditional media. They're trying to act as something different because they want to avoid the cost of moderating their content. That's why they ended up apologizing to Congress about all the fake news on their platforms. If someone wants to create toxic content hidden behind a username, UA-cam is not the platform for it. That era is long gone. No creator is irreplaceable. Shareholders and big advertisers are.

At this point, I think that intent vs principle is where the conversation is turning. You and I seem to have a very different opinion on whether or not someone abusing the ToS to dox a creator is right or not based on the content that was used under the guidelines of fair use. I respect your opinion, but very much disagree with most of it. I see where you’re coming from, but I don’t believe that the approach that this creator took is conducive to a healthy platform. Digression is something that a lot of channels, and even big music labels, practice on the platform. And it seems to work well. But abuse of ToS for the sake of bullying someone to sooth your hurt feelings is extremely toxic. Just as toxic as bullying behind a user name. But internet anarchist wasn’t bullying. He was talking about ANOTHER scam that this creator partook in that allegedly robbed people of money. It was well researched, accurate, unbiased, and factual. But this creator struck it down to censor, bully, and dox the Internet Anarchist. This creator then ALSO proceeded to make an entire video to gloat about how he abuses ToS to scary, bully, and dox creators under the guise of “this is business.” With that context in mind, I fully stand by my opinion that this is wrong in every way, potentially harmful to the platform, and dangerous to small creators who otherwise want to make researched content that might cover facts that hurt other people’s feelings.

Who? 👀😅

With the eggs? 😂

Scrambled or over easy?

@@GarrettCrespo over easy

I might do another video about homebrewing at some point. That kind of rekindled my joy for this thing after this video!

To each their own 😁

The Blu-ray player and dedicated PS2 hardware inside also hiked up the PS3 prices. But I agree

I totally agree. Bring up the walled garden probably wasn’t the best way to approach this, but brining up “apple” and “vertical integration” or “software exclusives” will inevitably lead to talk about the walled garden, might as well just bring it up right out the gate.

Never said it was a justification. Just thought it was cool. Literally tried to keep any personal preferences out of it and just showcase a really cool feature

Also, pricing isn’t really an argument for their computers since they’re literally running an architecture that is barely in the PC space and the ARM computers that have popped up in the PC space are price and performance comparable 🤷‍♂️

Aggressively asked me to RTFM after I had read it, done my research, and came to them after not finding a solid answer. Yep… totally my fault and not the stubborn, stuck up Linux folks I ran into It’s all good. I got my answer and it killed the project. No Linux for me. 🤷‍♂️

Just proving his point in the video. Rather than help answer a single question in 2 or 3 minutes, folks like yourself would rather invest between 10 to 20 minutes being condescending. Either help the person or say nothing and keep it moving. I can see why folks float away from Linux with responses like yours smh.

@@Garcian_Smith perhaps people do this because its annoying when people spam forums and chats begging for help with issues that are either: the first result on google, or in the wiki (also usually a top google result). people begging for support because they dont want to read or learn for themselves is extremely annoying.

@@kaywee You can't justify or rationalize being an asshole to someone who's simply looking for help. That like cussing someone out for simply asking for directions. If anything you and those people should work more on your tempers and patience rather than take it out on others. If anything the forums shouldn't make you mad unless you're one of those "chronically online" folk skulking forums for hours at a time. Screaming or insulting people into learning something is the thought process and logic of a sociopath.

@@Garcian_Smith these people dont want to learn and arent "asking for directions" they are demanding that you spoonfeed them the exact solution to their problem instead of having them learn